04 Dic Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these systems. Coming from lie recognition tools examined at the border to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being included in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to navigate these systems and to pursue their legal right for cover.

It also displays how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from getting at the channels of coverage. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects so, who are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double impact: although they aid to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.